On August 6, 2026, the Pennsylvania Utility Commission approves HMS Legal’s Judith Cassel to be one of two new board member for Regenerative Energy Initiative
An important win for HMS Legal and developers of renewable energy projects. The PUC decided a case involving deposits required by PPL Electric for interconnecting
he Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission issued its order approving the settlement in the PPL Electric Utilities rate proceeding, resolving a case in which PPL sought
HMS Legal’s KC Read-Fisher scores another win for client in employment dispute filed with U.S. Department of Labor under the Occupational Safety and Health Act
Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection is issuing Requests for Information in order to incentivize new energy generation, and most importantly, new energy storage projects. This
When parties have “pre-existing suits” in federal court but are subsequently ordered to arbitration, Supreme Court affirms that, upon completion of arbitration, federal courts retain
Not every workplace dispute ends when the employee leaves. HMS Legal congratulates Associate KC Read-Fisher on a recent win before the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board
On Wednesday, April 29, 2026, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro sent a letter to the CEOs of every Pennsylvania utility. In the letter he outlines three
MEDIA CONTACT: Governor’s Press Office, ra-gvgovpress@pa.gov PECO has withdrawn its proposed rate case, saving Pennsylvanians $510 million — reducing future utility bills by up to $34
Trump blocks U.S.’s renewable energy efforts even while his Iran War causes Americans to suffer higher gas prices due to foreign oil’s inability to pass
HMS Legal Melissa Chapaska had a substantive win in New Jersey for one of CLS’s cannabis clients. The case involves a CLS cannabis client’s efforts to hold a construction contractor accountable for negligence and fraud in the construction of a cannabis facility. Following Melissa’s successful oral argument on the merits of these claims, the judge denied the construction company’s attempts to dismiss these claims. The case will proceed to adjudicate whether the construction company can be held liable for damages resulting from the claims alleged.